That experience, which was like lightning in my heart, was most likely at a level below completely valid and incontrovertible realization. The impact lasted for a while, and for the next few weeks whenever I saw people, they seemed like a magician’s illusions in that they appeared to inherently exist but I knew that they actually did not. In the same way, when the thought “I” arises in dependence upon mind and body, nothing within mind and body-neither the collection which is a continuum of earlier and later moments, nor the collection of the parts at one time, nor the separate parts, nor the continuum of any of the separate parts-is in even the slightest way the “I.” Also there is not even the slightest something that is a different entity from mind and body that is apprehendable as the “I.” Consequently, the “I” is merely set up by conceptuality in dependence upon mind and body it is not established by way of its own entity. Therefore, that snake is merely set up by conceptuality.

Here is the passage:Ī coiled rope’s speckled color and coiling are similar to those of a snake, and when the rope is perceived in a dim area, the thought arises, “This is a snake.” As for the rope, at that time when it is seen to be a snake, the collection and parts of the rope are not even in the slightest way a snake. Sometime during the early sixties when I was reflecting on a passage by Tsongkhapa about unfindability and the fact that phenomena are dependent on conceptuality, it was as if lightning coursed within my chest. The fact that you cannot find them means that those phenomena do not exist under their own power they are not self-established. This turns out to be the case for everything, for all phenomena. In fact, the closer you look, the more it is not found. However, if there were such a separate I-self-established and existing in its own right-it should become clearer and clearer under the light of competent analysis as to whether it exists as either mind or body, or the collection of mind and body, or different from mind and body. Under the sway of this delusion, we view the self as existing under its own power, established by way of its own nature, able to set itself up. We all have a valid, proper sense of self, or “I,” but then we additionally have a misconception of that “I” as inherently existing. The fundamental cause of suffering is ignorance-the mistaken apprehension that living beings and objects inherently exist. The second and third noble truths lead us to understand the causes of suffering and whether or not those causes can be removed. From the time we are born to the time we die we suffer mental and physical pain, the suffering of change, and pervasive suffering of uncontrolled conditioning. To generate the type of love and compassion that motivates you to seek buddhahood, not for yourself but for the sake of others, first you must confront suffering by identifying its types.

The form of emptiness